ambassador

senior_ambassador

head_ambassador

members

proficient_members

fellows

architects

architects_adept

grand_architects

masters

masters_constant

grand_masters

retain_at_i_dan

retain_at_ii_dan

retain_at_iii_dan

retain_at_iv_dan

retain_at_v_dan

retain_at_vi_dan

promote_to_i_dan

promote_to_ii_dan

promote_to_iii_dan

promote_to_iv_dan

promote_to_v_dan

promote_to_vi_dan

fast_promote_to_i_dan

fast_promote_to_ii_dan

fast_promote_to_iii_dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 1 or above; `Success` is 1. Aka the "voice" of all Members.

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 2 or above; `Success` is 2. Aka the "voice" of members at least II Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 3 or above; `Success` is 3. Aka the "voice" of all Fellows

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 4 or above; `Success` is 4. Aka the "voice" of members at least IV Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 5 or above; `Success` is 5. Aka the "voice" of members at least V Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 6 or above; `Success` is 6. Aka the "voice" of members at least VI Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 7 or above; `Success` is 7. Aka the "voice" of all Masters

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 8 or above; `Success` is 8. Aka the "voice" of members at least VIII Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 9 or above; `Success` is 9. Aka the "voice" of members at least IX Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 3 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 1

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 4 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 2

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 5 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 3

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 6 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 4

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 7 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 5

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 8 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 6

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 3 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 1

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 4 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 2

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 5 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 3

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 6 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 4

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 7 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 5

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 8 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 6

- A proposal was made to change the backing timeout and approval-voting timeout for validators in Kusama.
- The change will increase the backing timeout from 2 seconds to 2.5 seconds and approval-voting timeout from 12 seconds to 15 seconds.
- The aim of this change is to ensure a smoother experience for async backing parachains that want to use the full 2 seconds of execution per block.
- The details of the call and parameters can be found on the provided links.
- The call has been tested locally with zombienet and on Versi/Rococo.

Executed

Bump parachain validation timeouts

[Fellows] Referendum #95: Whitelist #630 on Polkadot relay chain

Promoting Christian Langenbacher(clangenb) to DAN I

Serban Iorga is a contributor to Polkadot for 2 years. He is part of the Parity Bridges team and has contributed to bridges relayer and pallets, BEEFY & MMR. He supported the development of Polkadot <> Kusama and Polkadot <> Ethereum bridges. He wants to become a member of the fellowship. You can find his contributions on his GitHub profile.

[Promote To I Dan]  Serban Iorga

Alin is a member of the Parachains core team at Parity and wants to join Polkadot's technical fellowship as a 1st dan member. He has made notable contributions in several areas, including improving the availability-recovery subsystem, optimizing the performance of reed-solomon erasure coding, and supporting elastic scaling. Alin has also implemented a fallback request-response protocol in substrate and added NodeFeatures support to the runtime. He has made several pull requests on GitHub, including moving the minimum backing votes threshold to the runtime. His Polkadot address is 148f8D1P4CP2tV8JuaVHzEXQQgj3jBxEg3k9qZydPzkJjbQG.

[Promote To I Dan] Referendum #92

Here's a summary of s0me0ne-unkn0wn's contributions to Polkadot:

- They have been working on Polkadot since July 2022 and have been a core developer in the Parachain Core team since October 2022.
- They have made several contributions to the Polkadot codebase, including introducing execution environment parametrization, working on PVF execution determinism, and notable refactorings and improvements.
- They have also written two write-ups on PVF stack metering and achieving cross-platform stack determinism for PVF execution.
- They have participated in discussions on PVF execution determinism and promoted a better understanding of the determinism issues and how to handle them.
- They have applied for Dan I in Polkadot Fellowship and provided their Polkadot address as 13WGadgNgqSjiGQvfhimw9pX26mvGdYQ6XgrjPANSEDRoGMt.

[Promote To I Dan] Referendum #91

TimedOut

Obsolete.

Untitled

[Fellows] Referendum #87

Approve RFC-45

RFC 78: Merkleized Metadata

1. A previous referendum had set the wrong value for payout cycles.
2. This proposal aims to reduce the value by 12x to correct the mistake.
3. Four members were paid with the incorrect parameters but can return the extra payment to the salary pallet account.
4. The payout is limited to 100k due to budget limitations.
5. A suggestion was made to reduce the possibility of such mistakes in the future.

Fellowship Referenda