Retain alexggh at rank 2

Deciding
No context provided.
Who can edit?
Reply
Up
Share

Evidence for Retention

Argument-0006: Retention at Rank II

Report Date Date of submission (2025/12/21)
Submitted by Alexandru Gheorghe

Member details

  • Matrix username: @alexggh:parity.io
  • Polkadot address: 14uA7Vc828e2Q6oL5GBHP9UzTkEvwqbroERwRmucGrLmPuuL
  • Current rank: 2
  • Date of initial induction: 2024/07/20
  • Date of last report: 2025/09/05
  • Area(s) of Expertise/Interest: Parachains consensus

Reporting period

  • Start date: 2025/09/05
  • End date: 2025/12/21

Argument

During the reporting period, I switched focus from scalability, stability, and performance of the Polkadot network to helping with the launch of the smart contracts platform on assethub by working on the foundry Embedded EVM project, whose goal was to integrate pallet-revive as an execution backend into foundry forge test.

My contributions here were mostly around modifying pallet-revive and adding new APIs to allow foundry to better control and access the state of pallet-revive. Initially, my main focus was on providing functionality for various cheatcodes like prank, mocks, etch, and store, and then testing, debugging, and providing fixes so that the top three most important smart contracts platform tests can be successfully run. Full list of PRs and issues.

Additionally, I supported the Qadrivium and Chainsafe teams in delivering their proposals (see Qadrivium and Chainsafe). My role was advisory, providing technical reviews and guidance in my areas of expertise, for example, approval voting rewards and the new erasure-coding algorithm.

Over the last two months I have begun working on improving the polkadot-sdk statement-store protocol. This initiative is ongoing, my focus is twofold: profiling the node to improve performance so it can support larger scale with lower propagation latency, and redefining the API surface and implementing it (see Proposed API).

Other work:

Besides the mentioned topics, I'm providing reviews for my area of expertise in polkadot-sdk and RFCs.

Voting record

Provide your voting record in relation to required thresholds for your rank.

Ranks Activity thresholds Agreement thresholds Member's voting activities Comments
I 90% N/A
II 80% N/A I have voted on 0 out of 0 referenda in which I was eligible to vote (i.e 100 % voting activity)
III 70% 100%
IV 60% 90%
V 50% 80%
VI 40% 70%

Misc

  • Question(s):

  • Concern(s):

  • Comment(s):

Status
Decision14d
Confirmation
1hr
Attempts
0
Tally
100%Aye
0%Nay
Aye5
Nay0
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Bare Aye3
Max Voters11
All votes
Actions
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Comments