| Report Date | 2026/08/09 |
| Submitted by | Sergej Sakac |
During this reporting period, my work was focused on pUSD, Coretime and AHMv2.
pallet-psm from a single, governance-seeded PSM into a multi-instance design where PSMs are created permissionlessly and managed by their own admins (tracking issue). Creation became permissionless with per-instance admins in polkadot-sdk#12206, and the rework was completed in polkadot-sdk#12245. Follow-ups currently in review: correcting the creation-deposit footprint (polkadot-sdk#12811), unifying the decimal-scaling logic (polkadot-sdk#12842), and multi-instance fungibles support in the PSM remote tests (polkadot-sdk#11950).pallet-psm, I have been working on the pUSD project more generally.enable_auto_renew could charge a task for an unrelated task's renewal: polkadot-sdk#12750. Core assignments are rebuilt every region, so PotentialRenewals can hold records for the same core index belonging to different tasks, which enable_auto_renew didn't account for. This actually occurred on Polkadot, where task 3428 ended up paying for task 2094's renewal. The fix also cleans up the mismatched record currently on-chain.pallet-coretime-market, implementing the Market trait with a clearing-price Dutch auction, is under review (polkadot-sdk#11802), and the fp-coretime primitives crate, extracting the shared market types and traits out of pallet-broker, was merged (polkadot-sdk#11810).| Ranks | Activity thresholds | Agreement thresholds | Member's voting activities | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 90% | N/A | ||
| II | 80% | N/A | No referenda available for my rank during this period | |
| III | 70% | 100% | ||
| IV | 60% | 90% | ||
| V | 50% | 80% | ||
| VI | 40% | 70% |
Question(s):
Concern(s):
Comment(s):