ambassador

senior_ambassador

head_ambassador

atRank

Deciding

Submitted

DecisionStarted

DecisionDepositPlaced

retain_at_ii_dan

Retain alexggh at rank 2

# Argument-0009: Retention at Rank II

|                  |                                                                                |
| ---------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| **Report Date**  | 2026/09/21                                                                     |
| **Submitted by** | Alexandru Gheorghe                                                             |

## Member details

- Matrix username: @alexggh:parity.io
- Polkadot address: 14uA7Vc828e2Q6oL5GBHP9UzTkEvwqbroERwRmucGrLmPuuL
- Current rank: 2
- Date of initial induction: 2024/07/20
- Date of last report: 2026/06/15
- Area(s) of Expertise/Interest: Parachains consensus, statement-store protocol

## Reporting period

- Start date: 2026/06/16
- End date: 2026/09/21

## Argument

During this reporting period I've been on a long summer break (I skipped the equivalent of 2 salary cycles as well), so my evidence is lighter than usual; hopefully that is enough to preserve my rank and not be demoted.

In the brief period that I've been working, my focus has been on hardening the statement-store v1 protocol, reviewing and guiding the implementation of [statement-store v2](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pulls?q=is%3Apr+reviewed-by%3Aalexggh+created%3A2026-06-16..2026-09-21) and now I'm working on researching and implementing the [Metanode](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/metanode-early-thinking-on-consolidating-node-services/18689).

## Voting record

|  Ranks | Activity thresholds | Agreement thresholds | Member's voting activities | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|I  |90%   |N/A   | | |
|II |80%   |N/A   | I have voted on 0 out of 0 referenda in which I was eligible to vote (i.e 100 % voting activity) | There were no referendums available for my rank to vote on. |
|III|70%   |100%  |   |  |
|IV |60%   |90%   |   |  |
|V  |50%   |80%   |   |  |
|VI |40%   |70%   |   |  |

## Misc

- [ ] Question(s):

- [ ] Concern(s):

- [ ] Comment(s):

Argument-0009: Retention at Rank II

members

proficient_members

fellows

architects

architects_adept

grand_architects

masters

masters_constant

grand_masters

retain_at_i_dan

retain_at_iii_dan

retain_at_iv_dan

retain_at_v_dan

retain_at_vi_dan

promote_to_i_dan

promote_to_ii_dan

promote_to_iii_dan

promote_to_iv_dan

promote_to_v_dan

promote_to_vi_dan

fast_promote_to_i_dan

fast_promote_to_ii_dan

fast_promote_to_iii_dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 1 or above; `Success` is 1. Aka the "voice" of all Members.

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 2 or above; `Success` is 2. Aka the "voice" of members at least II Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 3 or above; `Success` is 3. Aka the "voice" of all Fellows

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 4 or above; `Success` is 4. Aka the "voice" of members at least IV Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 5 or above; `Success` is 5. Aka the "voice" of members at least V Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 6 or above; `Success` is 6. Aka the "voice" of members at least VI Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 7 or above; `Success` is 7. Aka the "voice" of all Masters

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 8 or above; `Success` is 8. Aka the "voice" of members at least VIII Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 9 or above; `Success` is 9. Aka the "voice" of members at least IX Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 3 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 1

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 4 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 2

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 5 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 3

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 6 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 4

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 7 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 5

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 8 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 6

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 3 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 1

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 4 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 2

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 5 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 3

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 6 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 4

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 7 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 5

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 8 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 6

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 3 or above when voting on a 30 day long track; `Success` is 1.

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 4 or above when voting on a 30 day long track; `Success` is 2.

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 5 or above when voting on a 30 day long track; `Success` is 3.

Ranks	Activity thresholds	Agreement thresholds	Member's voting activities	Comments
I	90%	N/A
II	80%	N/A	I have voted on 0 out of 0 referenda in which I was eligible to vote (i.e 100 % voting activity)	There were no referendums available for my rank to vote on.
III	70%	100%
IV	60%	90%
V	50%	80%
VI	40%	70%


Report Date	2026/09/21
Submitted by	Alexandru Gheorghe