Retain Serban Iorga at rank 1

Deciding
No context provided.
Who can edit?
Reply
Up
Share

Evidence for Retention

Argument-0008: Retention at Rank 1

Report Date 2026/06/30
Submitted by Serban Iorga

Member details

  • Matrix username: @serban.iorga:parity.io
  • Polkadot address: 14oHMAJ5btnDCusHrTWraw1wTsLJwZeqPDLxusm1R1Zh3Vxa
  • Current rank: 1
  • Date of initial induction: 2024/04/22
  • Date of last report: 2026/04/02
  • Area(s) of Expertise/Interest:
    • Bridges
    • BEEFY
    • MMR
    • XCMP/HRMP/DMP
    • Omni-Node
    • Cumulus Node
    • Parachain Authoring

Reporting period

  • Start date: 2026/04/03
  • End date: 2026/06/30

Argument

During this reporting period I have been focusing on the low-latency project: https://github.com/orgs/paritytech/projects/259.

One of the key innovations of the low-latency project is the introduction of V3 candidate descriptors with an explicit scheduling_parent field, separating the scheduling context (which determines validator group assignment) from the execution context (which determines parachain state). V3 candidates can be scheduled based on a different relay chain block than the one they execute against, enabling validators to assign backing responsibilities ahead of time while maintaining correct execution semantics. Related to this, I worked on PR https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/10742 that enables collators to build collations using the new descriptor format. The PR was started by eskimor and also contributed to by iulianbarbu and I drove it to completion.

Also on the cumulus side, as a follow-up, I opened and merged a couple of PRs that adjusted the logic for selecting the parent parachain header that we build on when creating V3 candidates:

I also did some small cleanup related to the cumulus test runtime, in order to make it easier to create more flavors: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/12231 . This was needed in order to add more test cases for the tasks mentioned above.

Voting record

Ranks Activity thresholds Agreement thresholds Member's voting activities Comments
I 90% N/A I have voted on 0 out of 0 referenda in which I was eligible to vote. -
II 80% N/A
III 70% 100%
IV 60% 90%
V 50% 80%
VI 40% 70%

Misc

  • Question(s):

  • Concern(s):

  • Comment(s):

Status
Decision14d
Confirmation
1hr
Attempts
0
Tally
100%Aye
0%Nay
Aye1
Nay0
  • 10.00%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Bare Aye1
Max Voters21
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Curves
Comments