| Report Date | 2026/03/05 |
| Submitted by | Michał Kucharczyk |
@michal:parity.io2024/06/022025/12/03Substrate node ,Transaction Pool, ChainSpec/GenesisConfigDuring this period I continued to deepen my expertise in Substrate node internals, specifically around block production, storage proofs, and the transaction pool.
The PoV size reclaim fix for issue #6020 remains under review. This work spans runtime, state machine, and trie layers — requiring cross-cutting understanding of how storage proofs flow through the stack and how they impact performance. To formalize the interface changes it introduces, I submitted RFC-158: Introduce v2 of storage_proof_size Host Function.
I performed a thorough review of the Block Bundling Node Side PR, which is a substantial change to block production mechanics. The review surfaced minor code maintainability improvements that I explored on my fork: BlockProductionSchedule and BlockImportAuxiliaryData removal.
As part of on-boarding to the PolkaJam implementation, I have been building familiarity with the JAM protocol through hands-on work on jamtart — a testing and benchmarking tool for JAM nodes. My main focus has been observability: the JAM toaster had limited tooling for protocol-level metrics, making debugging difficult. To address this I worked on events streaming, preliminary Grafana dashboards, database layer performance, and a JIP-3 telemetry stress testing tool for validating telemetry server capacity. As a side project, I also built jam-orbit (demo), an educational toy for visualising JAM validator activity.
The fork-aware transaction pool continues in maintenance mode. I investigated and filed Stuck transactions on Paseo Asset Hub, uncovering interesting edge cases around ETH transaction handling. I also participated in DevOps alert triage for asset-hub-polkadot reliability.
| Ranks | Activity thresholds | Agreement thresholds | Member's voting activities | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 90% | N/A | None. | |
| II | 80% | N/A | ||
| III | 70% | 100% | ||
| IV | 60% | 90% | ||
| V | 50% | 80% | ||
| VI | 40% | 70% |
Question(s):
Concern(s):
Comment(s):
Threshold