Retain tdimitrov at rank 2

No context provided.
Who can edit?
Reply
Up
Share

Evidence for Retention

Argument-0005: Retention at Rank 2

Report Date Date of submission (2026/02/25)
Submitted by Tsvetomir Dimitrov

Member details

  • Matrix username: @tsvetomir:parity.io
  • Polkadot address: 1QhVP5qzR2LfXqP77N1JcuwHoY7NH8JVRNFm1hSooE9d4pR
  • Current rank: 2
  • Date of initial induction: 2023/10/11
  • Date of last report: 2025/12/08
  • Area(s) of Expertise/Interest: Disputes, Collator protocol

Reporting period

  • Start date: 2025/12/08
  • End date: 2026/02/25

Argument

During this reporting period, my primary focus was driving the collator protocol revamp to completion. I finalized @alindima’s work on the collation manager and the main subsystem (polkadot-sdk pr-8541). Additionally, I developed a comprehensive test plan for the new implementation and a deployment strategy for rolling out the changes on Westend. During testing I discovered two new issues:

  • If request_candidates_pending_availability runtime call fails during reputation bumps extraction the processing of the rest of the candidates was terminated. Fixed in polkadot-sdk pr-10610.
  • A service race in libp2p (which was also discovered by @lexnv). I helped with the fix validation since it was easy to reproduce with the malus-collator. The fix by @lexnv is in litep2p pr-525. Disclaimer: I have no contribution for the fix itself.

I also verified the protocol’s resilience against spam attacks and confirmed that the collator scoring system functions correctly. Both were validated using malus-collator and local zombienet-sdk tests. Finally, I applied minor fixes to malus-collator and extended it with a new malicious behavior.

Since the collator revamp testing and malus-collator development are still not open sourced I can't give too much details about the actual test results and contributions to the Polkadot network.

Voting record

Ranks Activity thresholds Agreement thresholds Member's voting activities Comments
I 90% N/A
II 80% N/A I have voted on 0 out of 0 referenda in which I was eligible to vote (i.e 100 % voting activity). Out of 0 referenda in which members of higher ranks were in complete agreement, I have voted in line with the consensus 0 times (i.e 100 % voting agreement). There were no referendas I could participate in during the reporting period
III 70% 100%
IV 60% 90%
V 50% 80%
VI 40% 70%

Misc

  • Question(s):

  • Concern(s):

  • Comment(s):

Status
Decision14d
Confirmation
1hr
Attempts
0
Tally
100%Aye
0%Nay
Aye3
Nay0
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Bare Aye1
Max Voters11
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Curves
Comments