Retain alexggh at rank 1

No context provided.
Who can edit?
Reply
Up
Share

Evidence for Retention

Argument-0004: Retention at Rank I

Report Date Date of submission (2025/07/21)
Submitted by Alexandru Gheorghe

Member details

  • Matrix username: @alexggh:parity.io
  • Polkadot address: 14uA7Vc828e2Q6oL5GBHP9UzTkEvwqbroERwRmucGrLmPuuL
  • Current rank: 1
  • Date of initial induction: 2024/07/20
  • Date of last report: 2025/04/19
  • Area(s) of Expertise/Interest: Parachains consensus

Reporting period

  • Start date: 2025/04/20
  • End date: 2025/07/21

Argument

During the reporting period, I continued my work on improving the scalability, stability, and performance of the Polkadot network.

On the performance side, I've spent most of my time helping to increase the parachains' single-core throughput by optimizing various parts of our Trie database and weights stack and evaluating the impact of the optimizations. For this goal, I profiled and implemented several optimizations to help pack more Solidity smart contract calls on AssetHub, this resulted in reducing the per key read/write costs in validation context from 25us/100us to around 13/31us. I also finished improving the parachain block import and authoring time by making sure we keep the entire state in memory inside the TrieCache PR7682 and collaborated with Andrei Eres at an E2E test that prove the benefits of this optimisation with ERC20 transfers.

On the scalability and stability side, I worked on making sure Polkadot and Kusama incidents are properly understood, and the lessons learnt from it addressed, to achieve this goal I've been involved in root-causing, providing fixes and versi scale testing of the changes. List of issues that I've been positively contributing to:

Other work:

Besides the mentioned topics, I'm providing reviews for my area of expertise in polkadot-sdk and RFCs.

Voting record

Provide your voting record in relation to required thresholds for your rank.

Ranks Activity thresholds Agreement thresholds Member's voting activities Comments
I 90% N/A I have voted on 0 out of 0 referenda in which I was eligible to vote (i.e 100 % voting activity) There were no referendums available for my rank to vote on.
II 80% N/A
III 70% 100%
IV 60% 90%
V 50% 80%
VI 40% 70%

Misc

  • Question(s):

  • Concern(s):

  • Comment(s):

Status
Decision14d
Confirmation
1hr
Attempts
1
Tally
100%Aye
75.8%Threshold
0%Nay
Aye32
Nay0
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Bare Aye11
Max Voters24
All votes
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline6
Comments

I think the evidence should not just contain a list of merge requests but rather put them into perspective for someone who does not know anything about them.
Like: Why was it important for me to work on this? How is it relevant for Polkadot? (something like this)

Reply
Up