Promote tdimitrov to rank 2

Requirements for Rank to according to the manifesto:

  • Usefully assisted in implementing a major component from star to finish.
  • At least one published long-form semi-technical article concerning Polkadot
Edited
Reply
Up
Share

Evidence for Promotion

Evidence-0003: Promotion to Rank 2

Report Date Date of submission (2025/02/20)
Submitted by Tsvetomir Dimitrov

Member details

  • Matrix username: @tsvetomir:parity.io
  • Polkadot address: 1QhVP5qzR2LfXqP77N1JcuwHoY7NH8JVRNFm1hSooE9d4pR
  • Current rank: 1
  • Date of initial induction: 2023/10/11
  • Date of last report: 2024/08/28
  • Area(s) of Expertise/Interest: Disputes, Agile Coretime

Reporting period

  • Start date: 2024/11/28
  • End date: 2025/02/20

Evidence

During this reporting period I worked on a refined version of the collation fairness (polkadot-sdk issue-797). The PR is incomplete since I had to focus on the AssetHub migration.

For the AssetHub migration I am working on separating the coupling between the session and staking pallets. Since they should be on separate networks (session on relay chain and staking on AssetHub) they can't communicate directly with each other anymore. To overcome this I picked up an idea from gpestana to introduce two new pallets which communicate with each other over XCM and provide data to staking and session pallets. The initial effort for this is in polkadot-sdk pr-7582. At the moment I am working on integrating the pallets in Westend and AssetHub-Next.

I've also submitted two governance proposals for bumping schedulerParams.lookahead configuration parameter to 3. More information about this can be found in the corresponding referendas for Kusama and Polkadot.

Since I am applying for a rank 2 promotion I want to back my request with some examples of impactful work I did in the past:

Voting record

Ranks Activity thresholds Agreement thresholds Member's voting activities Comments
I 90% N/A I have voted on 0 out of 0 referenda in which I was eligible to vote (i.e 100 % voting activity). Out of 0 referenda in which members of higher ranks were in complete agreement, I have voted in line with the consensus 0 times (i.e 100 % voting agreement). There were no referendas I could participate in during the reporting period
II 80% N/A
III 70% 100%
IV 60% 90%
V 50% 80%
VI 40% 70%

Misc

  • Question(s):

  • Concern(s):

  • Comment(s):

Status
Decision30d
Confirmation
1hr
Attempts
1
Tally
100%Aye
74.0%Threshold
0%Nay
Aye12
Nay0
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Bare Aye5
Max Voters11
All votes
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline6
Comments

I am currently working with Tsvetomir on asset-hub staking pallets. While there is a lot of room for further familiarity with the internals of FRAME, how rust is used within it and the staking system, his attitude has been of one who is very willing to learn, and good progress is being made. That being said, I see a long slope of improvement ahead for Rank III :)

Reply
Up