Promote gui to rank 1

No context provided.
Who can edit?
Reply
Up
Share

Evidence for Promotion

Evidence-0001: Promotion to Rank 1

Report Date Date of submission (2025/01/09)
Submitted by Guillaume Thiolliere

Member details

  • Matrix username: @guillaume:parity.io
  • Polkadot address: 13psJuWEjBuZGaFqXvFnLMC6ME8RVVfQAhtFhydYjW45oKgZ
  • Current rank: 0
  • Date of initial induction: 2025/01/09
  • Date of last report: N/A
  • Area(s) of Expertise/Interest:
    • polkadot business-logic (aka the 'runtime')
    • the internals of the frame pallet framework
    • runtime and host APIs

Reporting period

  • Start date: 2024/08/01
  • End date: 2025/01/09

Evidence

Past work before the reporting period: I contributed to the internals of the frame pallet framework by writing the FRAMEv2 pallet macro (updating from decl_module! to #[pallet] macro: https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/6877). I designed and implemented the instantiable pallet concepts (https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/1800), this allows multiple instances of the same pallet in the runtime, bringing greater flexibility to pallets. I implemented the counted storage map (https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/9125), and the iterable storage map without linked list (https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/4185). Those features ease development of new features in polkadot pallets.

Work for the reporting period: I fixed tasks for instantiable pallets (https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5194), further enhancing pallets flexibility.

In the substrate runtime primitives I contributed to the transaction extension implementation, this feature allows more flexibility in the runtime and enables us to deliver more features in polkadot system chains:

I also contributed to some cumulus runtime components, on storage weight reclaim:

In the polkadot runtime I found out the benchmark configuration was suboptimal, potentially overestimating some weights, and fixed it (https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/525).

Voting record

Ranks Activity thresholds Agreement thresholds Member's voting activities Comments
I 90% N/A
II 80% N/A
III 70% 100%
IV 60% 90%
V 50% 80%
VI 40% 70%

Misc

  • Question(s):

  • Concern(s):

  • Comment(s):

Status
Decision30d
Confirmation
1hr
Attempts
1
Tally
100%Aye
78.7%Threshold
0%Nay
Aye32
Nay0
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Bare Aye12
Max Voters23
All votes
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline6
Comments
No comments here