[Retain At Iii Dan] Referendum #269

No context provided.
Who can edit?
Reply
Up
Share

Evidence for Retention

Retention at Rank 3

Report Date Date of submission (2025/01/06)
Submitted by Jan Bujak

Member details

  • Matrix username: @jan:parity.io
  • Polkadot address: 15tRXfXoZXkjScB3Awv8s2saPjaicKYAyL1WZ3JP5kycoG9n
  • Current rank: 3
  • Date of initial induction: seeding
  • Date of last report: 2024/05/09
  • Area(s) of Expertise/Interest: Substrate, virtual machines, WebAssembly, host <-> runtime interface, performance, JAM, compilers and toolchains

Reporting period

  • Start date: 2024-05-10
  • End date: 2025-01-06

Evidence

Most of my time was spent working on PolkaVM, which, while being one of many implementations of PVM (as described in the JAM Graypaper), is also the main vehicle for prototyping of any new additions to the PVM spec before they end up in the Graypaper.

In total I've made 250+ new commits to the PolkaVM repository, totaling over 50k+ lines of code and 50+ PRs, with too many changes to comprehensively list here; anyone interested in the gory details can take a look at the list of commits and/or the list of PRs I have made. My work has also directly resulted in numerous changes to the PVM spec.

Here are some of the highlights:

I have also been closely collaborating with the Smart Contracts team within Parity to help bring Smart Contracts to the Asset Hub on Polkadot, where PolkaVM will be used as the VM of choice. This work is currently still in-progress, with the first prototype already deployed on Westend.

I have also consulted on the PolkaVM parachains runtimes MVP, although I haven't directly contributed code to that effort in polkadot-sdk.

Finally, I have hosted a guest talk during the Polkadot Blockchain Academy in Singapore regarding PolkaVM and PVM.

In the next six months I plan to continue to focus on PolkaVM, help get the PVM spec finalized for JAM 1.0, and support the Smart Contracts team.

Voting record

Ranks Activity thresholds Agreement thresholds Member's voting activities Comments
III 70% 100% ~40/100 (40%)

I admit my voting record activity is not as high as it should be; I will make a conscious effort to do better and vote more often.

Status
Decision14d
Confirmation
1hr
Attempts
1
Tally
100%Aye
80.8%Threshold
0%Nay
Aye11
Nay0
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Bare Aye4
Max Voters7
All votes
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline6
Comments
No comments here