ambassador

senior_ambassador

head_ambassador

atRank

Executed

Submitted

DecisionStarted

DecisionDepositPlaced

ConfirmStarted

Confirmed

retain_at_i_dan

Retain Szego at rank 1

# Evidence-0003: Retention at Rank I

|                 |                                                                                             |
| --------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Report Date** | Date of submission (2024/12/20)                                               |
| **Submitted by**| Sergej Sakac                                                                  |


## Member details

- Matrix username: @snk2:matrix.org
- Polkadot address: 126X27SbhrV19mBFawys3ovkyBS87SGfYwtwa8J2FjHrtbmA
- Current rank: 1
- Date of initial induction: Seeding
- Date of last report: N/A
- Area(s) of Expertise/Interest: Polkadot runtime, Coretime, On-demand, XCM

## Reporting period

- Start date:  2024/10/11
- End date: 2025/01/07

## Evidence

Over the past three months, my primary focus has been working on on-demand and Coretime.

Specifically I have worked on implementing on-demand credits on the relay chain side. The work can be seen in this PR: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5990

I am currently developing on-demand integration modules to facilitate development for projects adopting the on-demand Coretime model for their parachain.

I also identified an issue with cross-chain transfers of Coretime regions on Polkadot and Kusama and created a PR to resolve it: [link](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/483)

## Voting record

As a Rank 1 member, I didn’t have many opportunities to be involved in voting activities.

|  Ranks | Activity thresholds | Agreement thresholds | Member's voting activities | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|I  |90%   |N/A   | There were no referenda I could vote on during this time period. |
|II |80%   |N/A   |   |  |
|III|70%   |100%  |   |  |
|IV |60%   |90%   |   |  |
|V  |50%   |80%   |   |  |
|VI |40%   |70%   |   |  |

## Misc

- [ ] Question(s): 

- [ ] Concern(s): 

- [ ] Comment(s): 

Evidence-0003: Retention at Rank I

members

proficient_members

fellows

architects

architects_adept

grand_architects

masters

masters_constant

grand_masters

retain_at_ii_dan

retain_at_iii_dan

retain_at_iv_dan

retain_at_v_dan

retain_at_vi_dan

promote_to_i_dan

promote_to_ii_dan

promote_to_iii_dan

promote_to_iv_dan

promote_to_v_dan

promote_to_vi_dan

fast_promote_to_i_dan

fast_promote_to_ii_dan

fast_promote_to_iii_dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 1 or above; `Success` is 1. Aka the "voice" of all Members.

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 2 or above; `Success` is 2. Aka the "voice" of members at least II Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 3 or above; `Success` is 3. Aka the "voice" of all Fellows

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 4 or above; `Success` is 4. Aka the "voice" of members at least IV Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 5 or above; `Success` is 5. Aka the "voice" of members at least V Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 6 or above; `Success` is 6. Aka the "voice" of members at least VI Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 7 or above; `Success` is 7. Aka the "voice" of all Masters

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 8 or above; `Success` is 8. Aka the "voice" of members at least VIII Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 9 or above; `Success` is 9. Aka the "voice" of members at least IX Dan

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 3 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 1

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 4 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 2

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 5 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 3

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 6 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 4

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 7 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 5

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 8 or above when voting on a fortnight-long track; `Success` is 6

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 3 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 1

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 4 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 2

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 5 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 3

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 6 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 4

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 7 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 5

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 8 or above when voting on a month-long track; `Success` is 6

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 3 or above when voting on a 30 day long track; `Success` is 1.

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 4 or above when voting on a 30 day long track; `Success` is 2.

Origin aggregated through weighted votes of those with rank 5 or above when voting on a 30 day long track; `Success` is 3.


Report Date	Date of submission (2024/12/20)
Submitted by	Sergej Sakac

Ranks	Activity thresholds	Agreement thresholds	Member's voting activities
I	90%	N/A	There were no referenda I could vote on during this time period.
II	80%	N/A
III	70%	100%
IV	60%	90%
V	50%	80%
VI	40%	70%