| Report Date | 2024/12/17 |
| Submitted by | s0me0ne-unkn0wn |
I was busy researching the state size growth problem and doing a lot of tests and participating in discussions regarding the switch to 10 Mb PoVs: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/5334 https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5884 https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5887
I also actively participated in the Spammening event, and created the Yet Another Parachain runtime, which was used as a target during the parachain spammening: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6089
Besides that, I started performing a deep dive into PolkaVM integration and put some effort into keeping the toolchain up to date (https://github.com/paritytech/rustc-rv32e-toolchain/pull/33), although in the end, it wasn't needed as the changes we required were propagated upstream in the meantime. I created a working PoC of PolkaVM-enabled parachains (https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6704) and helped a bit to push the latest PolkaVM into Substrate: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/6533 .
To sum up, my work during the reporting period was valuable, and thus, I'm applying for retention at Rank I.
| Ranks | Activity thresholds | Agreement thresholds | Member's voting activities | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 90% | N/A | I have voted on 0 out of 0 referendum in which I was eligible to vote (i.e undefined% voting activity). Out of 0 referenda in which members of higher ranks were in complete agreement, I have voted in line with the consensus 0 times (i.e undefined% voting agreement). | |
| II | 80% | N/A | ||
| III | 70% | 100% | ||
| IV | 60% | 90% | ||
| V | 50% | 80% | ||
| VI | 40% | 70% |
Question(s):
Concern(s):
Comment(s):
Threshold