Report Date | 2024/12/02 |
Submitted by | ordian |
13aYUFHB3umoPoxBEAHSv451iR3RpsNi3t5yBZjX2trCtTp6
Parachains Consensus
As you can see here, I haven't claimed any fellowship salary and not going to in the next salary period as well.
ParaInherent.enter
weightsI've investigated a long-time issue about ParaInherent.enter
weight being overestimated.
It was one of the remaining blockers allowing Polkadot to scale to 1k validators and 200 cores.
Along with resolving the issue in the following PRs: 1, 2, a long-standing low-impact security issue have been addressed as well.
While digging into the ParaInherent.enter
code, which serves as a critical on-chain part of shared security aspect of Polkadot (Parachains Consensus
), a few refactoring ideas have been suggested to make the code more resilient and future-proof.
After our team have investigated a finality issue that happened on Polkadot after a runtime upgrade, we have decided to prioritize fixing another long-standing issue.
Looking into the code that is outside of my expertise (substrate executor logic), I've created a fix. The PR has been later adjusted to the newly opened RFC 123 and is looking for feedback and reviews.
I have provided help with the (parachains) spammening project spanning across multiple areas
no_std
platform has been discovered and later fixed.After the relay chain spammening, I've also started an investigation into potential overweight issue:
As usual, I'm providing PR reviews and direction around my area of expertise.
Ranks | Activity thresholds | Agreement thresholds | Member's voting activities | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
III | 70% | 100% | During this period, I have voted on 75 out of 81 referenda in which I was eligible to vote (i.e 92.5% voting activity) with 100% agreement with higher ranks. | My overall voting activity is at 75.5% according to this script. |
I | 90% | N/A | ||
II | 80% | N/A | ||
III | 70% | 100% | ||
IV | 60% | 90% | ||
V | 50% | 80% | ||
VI | 40% | 70% |
Threshold