Retain Tsvetomir at Dan 1

Please find the retention proposal attached.

Edited
Reply
Up
Share

Evidence for Retention

Evidence-0002: Retention at/Promotion to Rank 1

Report Date Date of submission (2024/11/28)
Submitted by Tsvetomir Dimitrov

Member details

  • Matrix username: @tsvetomir:parity.io
  • Polkadot address: 1QhVP5qzR2LfXqP77N1JcuwHoY7NH8JVRNFm1hSooE9d4pR
  • Current rank: 1
  • Date of initial induction: 2023/10/11
  • Date of last report: 2024/08/28
  • Area(s) of Expertise/Interest: Disputes, Agile Coretime

Reporting period

  • Start date: 2024/08/28
  • End date: 2024/11/28

Evidence

During this reporting period I've finished my work on Agile Cortime migration testing on Polkadot. Unfortunately the chopsticks migration test which I wrote gave a false positive result (due to this issue) and we had to release another migration which fixes the Agile Coretime state. The migration was mainly done by @donal and @eskimor. I've contributed with testing and reviews. Link to the PR.

Next I worked on an implementation of collation fetching fairness for Agile Coretime. It is part of polkadot-sdk #1797. The problem turned out to be more complicated than I estimated initially which lead to a few iterations of the implementation. I made some wrong assumptions and went for a simple implementation which was not covering all cases. After figuring this out I did a rework which was more complex but covered all the edge cases. Link to the PR. At the time I am writing this evidence the PR is still not merged but it is pending a final code review and hopefully will be merged when the referenda is open for voting.

I am also working on the async backing parameters removal (issue). I did some preparations in the backing subsystem by removing the fallback code handling the absence of prospective parachains subsystem. Link to the PR.

During the reporting period I did small fixes for flaky zombienet tests which were breaking the CI pipeline. Link to PR1 and PR2.

Voting record

Provide your voting record in relation to required thresholds for your rank.

Ranks Activity thresholds Agreement thresholds Member's voting activities Comments
I 90% N/A I have voted on 0 out of 0 referenda in which I was eligible to vote (i.e 100 % voting activity). Out of 0 referenda in which members of higher ranks were in complete agreement, I have voted in line with the consensus 0 times (i.e 100 % voting agreement). There were no referendas I could participate in during the reporting period
II 80% N/A
III 70% 100%
IV 60% 90%
V 50% 80%
VI 40% 70%

Misc

  • Question(s):

  • Concern(s):

  • Comment(s):

Status
Decision14d
Confirmation
1hr
Attempts
1
Tally
100%Aye
68.8%Threshold
0%Nay
Aye21
Nay0
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Bare Aye6
Max Voters20
All votes
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline6
Comments
No comments here