[Retain at II Dan] Retain skunert at rank 2

No context provided.
Reply
Up
Share

Evidence for Retention

Evidence-0003: Retention at Rank II

Report Date 2024/10/28
Submitted by skunert

Member details

  • Matrix username: @sebastian:parity.io
  • Polkadot address: 1682A5hxfiS1Kn1jrUnMYv14T9EuEnsgnBbujGfYbeEbSK3w
  • Current rank: 2
  • Date of initial induction: 2024/01/08
  • Date of last report: 2024/07/29
  • Area(s) of Expertise/Interest: Cumulus Node, Substrate Node, Parachain Authoring, Weight

Reporting period

  • Start date: 2024/07/30
  • End date: 2024/10/30

Evidence

Proof weight hardening

During this reporting period I focused on the hardening of our proof weight system. Earlier this year we identified two issues with the way we handle proof size weight:

  1. #5229: Since PoV-reclaim only monitors SignedExtensions post-dispatch hook, it was missing trie accesses that occured in pre-dispatch hooks. Together with unbenchmarked extrinsic base weights on parachains, this can lead to an underestimation of proof weight.
  2. #6020: Both our benchmarking code and PoV-reclaim do currently not account for storage accesses that happen during the storage root calculation in finalize_block.

I worked on a quick fix to alleviate the impact of #5229 (#5281, #5257). However, proper hardening of the proof weight includes multiple steps, one of which is to integrate overhead benchmarking into the frame-omni-bencher in polkadot-sdk. Before, benchmarking block overhead and extrinsic base weight was not supported for parachains at all. I worked on identifying the requirements and came up with the design in #5303. Then I implemented the proposed changes, leading to #5891.

Slot-based collator

Another workstream has been the continuation of the slot-based collator improvements #6066. The MVP is in place and works for elastic scaling chains which want to produce blocks at fixed intervals, with one block per slot. However, the slot-based collator should aim to fully replace our existing collator implementations with the following improvements:

  • Simplified modification of block production timings and conditions
  • Introduction of a slot-based collator variant that is behaviour-compatible with the lookahead collator.
  • Implementation of multi-block authoring support per parachain slot

Work on this has started but is not yet presentable.

Support

I invested time in supportive work:

  • Sparred with Michal on the fork-aware transaction pool and spent a significant amount of time on its review #4639
  • Reviewed fellowship RFC #103
  • Reviewed runtime PRs (3) list
  • Reviewed polkadot-sdk PRs (69) list

Voting record

Provide your voting record in relation to required thresholds for your rank.

Ranks Activity thresholds Agreement thresholds Member's voting activities Comments
III 70% N/A
I 90% N/A There was nothing to vote on.
II 80% N/A There was nothing to vote on.
III 70% N/A
IV 60% N/A
V 50% N/A
VI 40% N/A

Misc

  • Question(s):

  • Concern(s):

  • Comment(s):

Status
Decision14d
Confirmation
1hr
Attempts
1
Tally
100%Aye
72.3%Threshold
0%Nay
Aye12
Nay0
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Bare Aye5
Max Voters12
All votes
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline6
Comments
No comments here