| Report Date | Date of submission (2024/10/15) |
| Submitted by | Christian Langenbacher |
@clang:matrix.org16YCL3UVpVWQLGW3p3Zx4k5WAEp9W1DwdDnxAbyAaPxVxnp312024/03/272024/07/02Parachain Builder, Runtime, ClientsMy sole code contribution this time, was identifying, reproducing, and fixing a bug in the polkadot-sdk, which resulted in a build error under some circumstances due to an unhygenic widely-used macro, namely the format_runtime_string! macro, see the fix in PR #5632. This bug has indeed affected some parachain teams, and was backported into both stable2407 and stable2409.
I don't have any other hard evidence, but naturally, I have continued staying active in the ecosystem mostly as parachain a builder in Encointer, Integritee and Ajuna.
Provide your voting record in relation to required thresholds for your rank.
| Ranks | Activity thresholds | Agreement thresholds | Member's voting activities | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 90% | N/A | 2 eligible referenda: #117 #150 which missed my attention | |
| II | 80% | N/A | ||
| III | 70% | 100% | ||
| IV | 60% | 90% | ||
| V | 50% | 80% | ||
| VI | 40% | 70% |
Question(s):
Concern(s):
Comment(s):
Threshold
Thank you for your proactive statement, which I completely understand. To be honest, I agree that improvements are necessary, and I am committed to making those changes. Unfortunately, due to being fully employed elsewhere (in the ecosystem), I neglected my fellowship duties more than I should have, not realizing how quickly time passed.
Moreover, it was only recently established that non-Encointer work does not qualify as valid fellowship evidence. Because of this, I hadn't mentioned it before, but I did contribute by upgrading Encointer's runtime Polkadot dependencies, whenever it was necessary.
I’m not trying to influence your deferred vote but rather providing additional context in case someone else is reading. I fully support waiting for others to vote.
Hey there, I would like to note that I am indeed living up to my promised commitment. I have picked up some work in the polkadot-sdk repository, see #6302, #6301, #6300, #6299, #6294, #6291.
These are all maintenance PRs. They migrate the respective pallet's benchmarks to the Benchmark V2 syntax. I hope I can sway some minds with this comment to vote aye, as there hasn't been any resonance so far.
Naturally, I will not include those PRs in my next evaluation as evidence. I consider this overdue homework. :)
I am not sure if the magnitude here is sufficient as rank defence - going to let higher ranks vote first.