Threshold
Thank you for your proactive statement, which I completely understand. To be honest, I agree that improvements are necessary, and I am committed to making those changes. Unfortunately, due to being fully employed elsewhere (in the ecosystem), I neglected my fellowship duties more than I should have, not realizing how quickly time passed.
Moreover, it was only recently established that non-Encointer work does not qualify as valid fellowship evidence. Because of this, I hadn't mentioned it before, but I did contribute by upgrading Encointer's runtime Polkadot dependencies, whenever it was necessary.
I’m not trying to influence your deferred vote but rather providing additional context in case someone else is reading. I fully support waiting for others to vote.
Hey there, I would like to note that I am indeed living up to my promised commitment. I have picked up some work in the polkadot-sdk repository, see #6302, #6301, #6300, #6299, #6294, #6291.
These are all maintenance PRs. They migrate the respective pallet's benchmarks to the Benchmark V2 syntax. I hope I can sway some minds with this comment to vote aye, as there hasn't been any resonance so far.
Naturally, I will not include those PRs in my next evaluation as evidence. I consider this overdue homework. :)
I am not sure if the magnitude here is sufficient as rank defence - going to let higher ranks vote first.