Retain Serban Iorga at rank 1"

Executed

See retention info for Seban below.

Edited
Reply
Up
Share

Evidence for Retention

Evidence-0002: Retention at Rank 1

Report Date 2024/10/02
Submitted by Serban Iorga

Member details

  • Matrix username: @serban.iorga:parity.io
  • Polkadot address: 14oHMAJ5btnDCusHrTWraw1wTsLJwZeqPDLxusm1R1Zh3Vxa
  • Current rank: 1
  • Date of initial induction: 2024/03/12
  • Date of last report: 2024/07/03
  • Area(s) of Expertise/Interest:
    • Bridges
    • BEEFY
    • MMR
    • Omni-Node

Reporting period

  • Start date: 2024/07/04
  • End date: 2024/10/02

Evidence

In the current reporting period, my main contributions have been related to Omni-Node and parity-scale-codec.

Omni-Node

I worked on separating the generic logic from polkadot-parachain-bin in a library (polkadot-parachain-lib): https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5288 . This enables the parachain teams to build their own slightly customized node, without duplicating the code in polkadot-parachain-bin.

I have added support for starting nodes with u64 block number in polkadot-parachain-lib: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5269 . This was needed in order to support a parachain use case: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4787 .

I have added support for starting a node with manual seal to polkadot-parachain-lib: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5586 . This is aimed at improving parachain development/debugging speed.

parity-scale-codec

I worked on adding support for tracking and limiting the heap memory usage while decoding: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-scale-codec/pull/616 .

Other

I added benchmarks for the BEEFY forking equivocation logic: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/pull/5188 .

Voting record

Ranks Activity thresholds Agreement thresholds Member's voting activities Comments
I 90% N/A I have voted on 0 out of 1 referenda in which I was eligible to vote (0% voting activity).
II 80% N/A
III 70% 100%
IV 60% 90%
V 50% 80%
VI 40% 70%

Misc

  • Question(s):

  • Concern(s):

  • Comment(s):

Status
Decision14d
Confirmation
1hr
Attempts
1
Tally
100%Aye
66.5%Threshold
0%Nay
Aye7
Nay0
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Bare Aye5
Max Voters20
All votes
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline6
Comments

The substance of this evidence is definitely valid for rank 1 retention, going to AYE on that.
My only critic point here would be package it a bit nicer and explaining what the impact is. Why is it important for Polkadot?

Reply
Up 1