[Retain At I Dan] Michal

Executed

Find his evidence here. The new mempool is quite impressive work and speaks for itself, in my opinion.

Edited
Reply
Up
Share

Evidence for Retention

Evidence-0001: Retention at Rank I

Report Date 2024/10/02
Submitted by Michał Kucharczyk

Member details

  • Matrix username: @michal:parity.io
  • Polkadot address: 14T9NGF7LdCY7SK2j6oNXmB9NqfKYyrxBChUvYRjtFdvZBMo
  • Current rank: 1
  • Date of initial induction: 2024/06/02
  • Date of last report: N/A
  • Area(s) of Expertise/Interest: Substrate node ,Transaction Pool, ChainSpec/GenesisConfig

Reporting period

  • Start date: 2024/06/02
  • End date: 2024/10/02

Evidence

I am currently focused on refactoring the transaction pool and implementing a fork-aware version to address the issues outlined in #1202 issue. The related pull request #4369 is under review. The design and approach are detailed in this short top-level design note. Following the knowledge-sharing sessions I conducted within the Node SDK team, I authored a technical note on the fork-aware transaction pool. Additionally, I have started working on a transaction test tool designed to facilitate local and QA tests of the transaction pool. The follow-up work is planned here. This work improves transaction handling under forks, a critical aspect of parachains performance and resilience.

The most important lessons I have learned from this work include:

  • Building a generic transaction graph for efficient transaction pool management,
  • Addressing the challenge of preventing block builder starvation, ensuring smooth non-empty block production.

Additionally, I have minor contributions to Omni-Node, primarily by focusing on chain specifications and genesis configuration across various runtimes through reviews. Some related small PRs include: #4678, #5813, and #4739.

Voting record

Ranks Activity thresholds Agreement thresholds Member's voting activities Comments
I 90% N/A None. I'll try to improve it.
II 80% N/A
III 70% 100%
IV 60% 90%
V 50% 80%
VI 40% 70%

Misc

  • Question(s):

  • Concern(s):

  • Comment(s):

Status
Decision14d
Confirmation
1hr
Attempts
1
Tally
100%Aye
68.8%Threshold
0%Nay
Aye24
Nay0
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Bare Aye6
Max Voters20
All votes
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline6
Comments
No comments here