[Retain at I Dan] Retain dharjeezy at rank 1

No context provided.
Reply
Up
Share

Evidence for Retention

Evidence-0002: Retention at Rank I

Report Date Date of submission (2024/10/1)
Submitted by Damilare Akinlose

Member details

  • Matrix username: @dharjeezy/:matrix.org
  • Polkadot address: 12GyGD3QhT4i2JJpNzvMf96sxxBLWymz4RdGCxRH5Rj5agKW
  • Current rank: 1
  • Date of initial induction: 2024-04-29
  • Date of last report: 2024-07-01
  • Area(s) of Expertise/Interest: FRAME & Runtime

Reporting period

  • Start date: 2024/07/29
  • End date: 2024/10/29

Evidence

I discussed about how to ensure that pallet MQ message processing is transactional and I also implemented the enforcement of transactional processing to Pallet MQ message processing.

I also had to refactor what I did before when I introduced a new extrinsic for full unbonding in pallet staking, but it was later advised that instead of introducing a new extrinsic, it will make sense to actually support chilling first when a user calls unbond to unbond all amount staked. You can find details of the implementation here.

I added a new invariant try state check in the nomination-pools pallet for checking that a pool's point can never be lower than the stake in the same pool.

I implemented a different way of constructing genesis config values for all runtimes, how it was previously done is by using json, this newer implementation made use of the RuntimeGenesisConfig instead.

I also included events to be emitted for voting and removal of vote in conviction pallet.

I also worked on invariants try state checks for the membership pallet.

I am currently working on adding various invariant try state checks for the democracy pallet.

I believe my contributions to the Polkadot ecosystem this past reporting period has been vital and are in cognisance to what the Technical Fellowship upholds for a Rank I member. I am also thankful and grateful to the insights and counsel given me by the higher ranks and co-rank member of the Fellowship which has enabled me to be active and being a member of the Fellowship.

Voting record

Ranks Activity thresholds Agreement thresholds Member's voting activities Comments
I 90% N/A I have voted on 0 out of 2 referenda, during this period, I really did not pay attention to them I'd do better on looking out for proposals under my track and vote accordingly.
II 80% N/A
III 70% 100%
IV 60% 90%
V 50% 80%
VI 40% 70%

Misc

  • Question(s):

  • Concern(s):

  • Comment(s):

Status
Decision14d
Confirmation
1hr
Attempts
1
Tally
100%Aye
60.0%Threshold
0%Nay
Aye16
Nay0
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Bare Aye5
Max Voters20
All votes
Actions
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline6
Comments