wishes to retain at rank1
8hrs 4mins ago
0

Argument-0006: Retention at Rank I

Report Date 2025/10/22
Submitted by Damilare Akinlose

Member details

  • Matrix username: @dharjeezy/:matrix.org
  • Polkadot address: 12GyGD3QhT4i2JJpNzvMf96sxxBLWymz4RdGCxRH5Rj5agKW
  • Current rank: 1
  • Date of initial induction: 2024-04-29
  • Date of last report: 2025/07/23
  • Area(s) of Expertise/Interest: FRAME/Runtime & Node

Reporting period

  • Start date: 2025/07/23
  • End date: 2025/10/22

Argument

I am applying for Rank I retention.

During this period, my contributions have focused on enhancing the flexibility, reliability, and efficiency of both the Polkadot SDK runtime and the underlying litep2p networking stack. I have taken on issues that improve the developer experience, strengthen network resilience, and ensure the correctness of core pallets. My work demonstrates a commitment to delivering high-quality, impactful solutions across multiple domains of the ecosystem.

Below is a summary of my key contributions:

Flexible & Developer-Focused

Allow Specifying a Storage Deposit Payer for Calls

To enhance the flexibility of transaction payments, I implemented a feature allowing a specified account—other than the transaction's origin—to pay for storage deposits. As detailed in PR #9543, this change removes a significant limitation and enables more complex use cases where transaction costs can be sponsored or managed by a separate entity, improving the overall developer experience. Though, this change was deeemed redundant based on the new updates to pallet revive.

Expose Block Number Provider Name as a Constant

I finished the implementation to expose the name of the BlockNumberProvider as a runtime constant. Tracked in PR #9091, this feature is crucial for application developers who need to differentiate between a parachain's local block number and the Relay Chain's block number.


Reliable & Resilient

proxy.removeProxies: Emit Event on Clearing All Delegates

I added an event for the proxy.removeProxies extrinsic, which calls remove_all_proxy_delegates. Previously, this action lacked an event, creating an observability gap that was inconsistent with addProxy and removeProxy. As implemented in PR #10073, an event is now emitted with the delegator's AccountId, ensuring this significant action is recorded on-chain and available for indexers.

Introduce try_state Hook for Pallet-Alliance

To bolster the integrity of pallet-alliance, I introduced a try_state hook to verify key storage invariants. This proactive measure, implemented in PR #10000, helps ensure the pallet's state remains consistent and correct during runtime upgrades or state transitions, preventing potential bugs.

litep2p: Implement Periodic Ping for Connection Liveness

I continued with the challenging implementation to add periodic pings in litep2p, ensuring reliable detection of broken connections. The core difficulty, as discussed in PR #416, was adhering to the libp2p specification of using a single, long-lived substream without artificially keeping the connection alive. My solution involved introducing a stateful peer management system, and a commitment to spec-compliant solution.


Efficient & Optimized

litep2p: Optimize Propagation of Dial Failure Messages

I improved the efficiency of the TransportManager by refining how DialFailure events are propagated. In PR #443, I modified the logic to send detailed address failure information only to the Kademlia protocol handler, which requires it for its address store. Other protocols now receive a more lightweight event, reducing unnecessary data propagation and improving the performance of the transport layer.

litep2p: Optimize WebRTC Decoding Buffer

I optimized the WebRTC transport by making the decoding buffer size configurable. This change, part of PR #442, allows node operators to set a sensible default while providing the flexibility to adjust it for different environments. This prevents over-allocation of memory and improves decoding efficiency.


Voting record

Ranks Activity thresholds Agreement thresholds Member's voting activities Comments
I 90% N/A I have voted on 0 out of 0 referenda in which I was eligible to vote (i.e undefined% voting activity). Out of xx referenda in which members of higher ranks were in complete agreement, I have voted in line with the consensus x times (i.e undefined% voting agreement).
II 80% N/A
III 70% 100%
IV 60% 90%
V 50% 80%
VI 40% 70%

Misc

  • Question(s):
  • Concern(s):
  • Comment(s):
Reply
Up
Share
#421·
Comments
No comments here