wishes to retain at rank1
7d ago
0

Argument-0005: Retention at Rank I

Report Date 2025/07/23
Submitted by Damilare Akinlose

Member details

  • Matrix username: @dharjeezy/:matrix.org
  • Polkadot address: 12GyGD3QhT4i2JJpNzvMf96sxxBLWymz4RdGCxRH5Rj5agKW
  • Current rank: 1
  • Date of initial induction: 2024-04-29
  • Date of last report: 2025/04/29
  • Area(s) of Expertise/Interest: FRAME/Runtime & Node

Reporting period

  • Start date: 2025/06/01
  • End date: 2025/09/30

Argument

I am applying for Rank I retention.

In this cycle, my focus has been on enhancing the Polkadot SDK's efficiency, reliability, and interoperability. I have delivered key improvements across various pallets and libraries, from optimizing storage operations and improving network resilience to enabling cross-system functionality and enhancing developer experience.

Below is a summary of my key contributions:

Efficient & Performant

EPMB / signed pallet: Lazy Deletion for Leaders

I implemented support for the lazy deletion of leaders in the pallet-election-provider-multi-phase's signed pallet. The previous take_leader_with_data function forced a full deletion of all associated data pages, which was inefficient. By introducing a with_data: bool flag, this PR #9025 allows for the removal of a leader without immediately deleting all their submission data, significantly improving performance by deferring storage-intensive operations.

Refactor pallet-bounties to V2 Benchmarking Syntax

As part of the ongoing effort to modernize the SDK's codebase, I refactored pallet-bounties to use the new V2 benchmarking syntax. This contribution, tracked in PR #8952, ensures the pallet's benchmarks are consistent with current standards, improving maintainability and accuracy.


Reliable & Observable

Add poll_index to Conviction Voting Events

To improve the indexability of on-chain governance data, I added the poll_index field to the Voted and VoteRemoved events in pallet-conviction-voting. As detailed in PR #8840, this change allows indexing services and developers to precisely track voter activity for specific referenda, which was previously not possible with 100% accuracy.

litep2p: Periodic Ping for Connection Liveness

I enhanced the ping mechanism in litep2p to send requests periodically, rather than just once upon connection. This implementation, found in PR #416, aligns with libp2p standards and provides a robust method for detecting broken or stale connections, improving overall network reliability without artificially keeping connections alive.

litep2p: Improved Error Handling in WebRTC Noise Functions

I finalized the work on improving error handling within the WebRTC-related Noise handshake functions in litep2p. This effort, completed in PR #377, replaces unchecked unwrap() calls and assumptions about message sizes with proper error propagation, preventing potential panics and making the implementation more resilient.


Configurable & Extensible

Port remote-proxy Pallet to Polkadot-SDK for Westend

Addressing a critical need for teams building on parachains, I initiated the process to port the remote-proxy pallet to the Polkadot-SDK and enable it on Westend. As outlined in PR #9088, this will allow proxy relationships to function across different systems, a vital feature for post-Asset Hub migration scenarios. This work unblocks projects that rely on proxies for seamless user experiences.

Expose the BlockNumberProvider Used by Pallets

To improve the developer experience, especially in a post-Asset Hub Migration world, I am working on a method to expose which BlockNumberProvider a pallet is configured to use. By exposing the provider's name in the metadata, PR #9091 allows DApp developers to reliably distinguish between local and Relay Chain block numbers, preventing critical errors in applications that depend on timing.

Security: Proof of Key Ownership

I collaborated with other contributors on introducing a proper proof of key ownership for BLS keys in the runtime. This foundational work, detailed in the discussion for PR #9258, is essential for generating and verifying secure proofs and will be revisited once prerequisite pull requests are merged.


Voting record

Ranks Activity thresholds Agreement thresholds Member's voting activities Comments
I 90% N/A I have voted on 0 out of 0 referenda in which I was eligible to vote (i.e undefined% voting activity). Out of xx referenda in which members of higher ranks were in complete agreement, I have voted in line with the consensus x times (i.e undefined% voting agreement).
II 80% N/A
III 70% 100%
IV 60% 90%
V 50% 80%
VI 40% 70%

Misc

  • Question(s):
  • Concern(s):
  • Comment(s):
Reply
Up
Share
#383·
Comments
No comments here